Forgery is the bane of the art world. An artist passes his work off under another artist’s name and reaps financial gain. But what does it mean when a forger practices his trade for art’s sake without accepting a cent in return? In a recent issue of Financial Times, John Gapper documents the curious case of Mark Augustus Landis (shown above), a forger who for the past three decades donned disguises to coax museums across the United States to accept his work as a “donation” done by a name (but not too big a name) artist. As far as anyone can tell, Landis hasn’t broken any laws by asking for nothing in return for his art, but has he violated a different code through his actions? Or has this strange outlaw given a unique testimonial to the power of art to drive an individual to go to any lengths for self-expression? Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Outlaw Artist."
1 comment:
Hi Bob!
I just knew there's such a person like Mark Ausgustus in this world after reading your entry. I wonder what motivated Mark in doing what he did. Did he really do it for the sake of self-expression? This is already beyond the issues of forgery. It almost sound psychological. Like a "Wow!"
http://aderberani.blogspot.com/
read the rest of it there tomorrow...)
Post a Comment