Showing posts with label Science and Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Science and Art. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
How Man Ray Made Art of Math and Shakespeare
While advanced math and Shakespeare combine to make a nightmare curriculum for some students, for artist Man Ray, one of the most intriguing minds of 20th century art, they were “such stuff as dreams are made on,” or at least art could be made from. A new exhibition at The Phillips Collection reunites the objects and photographs with the suite of paintings they inspired Man Ray to create and title Shakespearean Equations. Man Ray—Human Equations: A Journey from Mathematics to Shakespeare traces the artist’s travels between disciplines, between war-torn
continents, and between media that became not only a journey from
arithmetic to the Bard, but also a journey of artistic self-discovery. Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "How Man Ray Made Art of Math and Shakespeare."
Tuesday, May 27, 2014
Illuminating Walt Whitman’s Words with Pictures
It’s one of the great openings in all of American literature: “I
celebrate myself, / And what I assume you shall assume, / For every atom
belonging to me as good belongs to you.” So begins Walt Whitman’s “Song of Myself,” the opening and central poem of Whitman’s life’s work, Leaves of Grass.
Generations of readers—many enthralled, but many confused—have
encountered the “Good Gray Poet” in classrooms, but Whitman’s the poet
of wide open spaces from the wilderness to the cosmos. Allen Crawford’s new illustrated version of “Song of Myself,” titled Whitman Illuminated: Song of Myself,
hopes to bring clarity to those struggling with the poem in the belief
that “every atom belonging to” Whitman “as good” still remains to us, if
only we can crack the poet’s code and rediscover the good he recognized
in everyone through his fervent spiritual, poetic, and democratic
ideals. Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Illuminating Walt Whitman’s Words with Pictures."
Thursday, April 17, 2014
How Neurocomic Gets Into Your Head
The two “go to” occupations for conveying the idea of genius are usually “rocket scientist” and “brain surgeon.”
Only the best minds pursue the mysteries of the outer space beyond our
atmosphere or the inner space between our ears. We all have brains, but
getting our brains to understand themselves seems something reserved
only for the eggiest of eggheads. Two neuroscientists, Drs. Hana Roš and Matteo Farinella, have teamed up to create the educational and entertaining graphic novel Neurocomic.
By turning neurons into trees, the depths of memory into caves, and the
mind’s self-deceptiveness into a haunted castle, Roš and Farinella take
you on a visual and verbal rollercoaster ride into your own brain
in hopes of bringing the non-brain surgeons of the world closer to
cutting through all the scientific jargon and considering the big
questions of brain versus mind, how we remember, and how we become who
we are. A mind trip in every sense of the word, Neurocomic gets into your head to get you into your own head. Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "How Neurocomic Gets Into Your Head."
Labels:
Big Think,
Comics,
Farinella (Matteo),
Munch (Edvard),
Science and Art
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Do Liars Make Better Artists?
“Oh! what a tangled web we weave,” Sir Walter Scott wrote in his 1808 epic poem Marmion,
“When first we practice to deceive!” But what a pretty web it might be,
researchers might add today. The idea that being a good liar helps one
be a better actor, novelist, or painter isn’t a new one, but a group of business school professors recently put the idea to an empirical test
and came up with some interesting conclusions about the connection
between deceit and creativity. Not only might artists be better at
lying, cheating, and general rule breaking, but it’s also possible that
such behaviors might actually add to one’s creativity. At the risk of
plunging the art world and the world in general into chaos, can we
ignore the question of whether liars make better artists? Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Do Liars Make Better Artists?"
Labels:
Big Think,
Caravaggio,
Cezanne (Paul),
Science and Art
Thursday, January 16, 2014
Are Our Minds Wired to Enjoy Cubism?
When Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque first brought Cubism onto the modern art scene in the first decade of the 20th century, the initialreviews
were mixed. Like-minded artists and art lovers embraced Cubism as a
startling new way of seeing breaking violently with the representational
art of the past. Many others, however, saw only madness and perhaps a
little fraud in these images taking everyday objects and representing
them from every angle simultaneously. Preferences for modernism or
classicism certainly played a big role in responses. But what if we
could wipe away those preferences? Would an unprejudiced viewer accept
and maybe even enjoy Cubist paintings? A team of researchers recently
tackled that question by testing whether art novices shown a series of
Cubist works expressed a liking for the works and if
detectablility—whether or not the viewer could visually reverse engineer
the image back to its everyday source—played a role. Their results not
only suggest that Cubism can be enjoyed by the novice, but that more
difficult (but not too difficult) works to untangle tickle the pleasure
zones of the mind. Are our minds wired to enjoy Cubism? Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Are Our Minds Wired to Enjoy Cubism?"
Thursday, November 21, 2013
How Rodin Turned Early Neurology into Modern Sculpture
When we look at the sculpture of Auguste Rodin,
we can’t help but feel what his figures feel. Every inch of those
sculpted bodies “speaks” the language of passion, whether it be of joy,
love, yearning, or anguish. In a recent study of Rodin’s The Gates of Hell, art historian Natasha Ruiz-Gómez of the University of Essex links the figures found on those monumental doors (such as Rodin’s Damned Woman; shown above) to images from the work of Jean-Martin Charcot, one of the founders of modern neurology and one of the fathers of the malady known as hysteria.
When Rodin looked for a way to break away from the tired tropes of
classical sculpture, Ruiz-Gómez suggests, he turned to modern medicine,
especially Charcot’s work, which linked psychological and physical
states in a way that showed Rodin how to make people see what others
feel. By linking art and science, this study opens a new door into
Rodin’s art as well as why that art still captures our imagination
today. Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "How Rodin Turned Early Neurology into Modern Sculpture."
Labels:
Big Think,
Michelangelo,
Rodin,
Science and Art,
Women in Art
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

