Friday, September 28, 2012

Why You Shouldn’t Believe the “Earlier Mona Lisa” Hype




A second Mona Lisa? One made even earlier than the one hanging in the Louvre? It sounds almost too good to be true, and probably is. A Swiss-based organization calling itself The Mona Lisa Foundation launched a full-scale international media assault asserting that the painting formerly known as the Isleworth Mona Lisa is actually also by Leonardo da Vinci and is the long-presumed-lost “Earlier Mona Lisa” (detail shown above) alluded to in texts by Leonardo’s contemporaries. The idea that the most famous painting in the world suddenly has an older “sister” understandably sent a shockwave through not just the art world, but the world at large. But after the dust settles, the “Earlier Mona Lisa” is most likely neither earlier nor a Leonardo Lisa. Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Why You Shouldn’t Believe the “Earlier Mona Lisa” Hype."

1 comment:

Hels said...

I find the entire story fascinating and have linked it to my Mona Lisa post. Why do you think the Swiss organisation spend so much money on the project?

Hels
http://melbourneblogger.blogspot.com.au/2012/04/mona-lisa-stolen-in-1911-and-retrieved.html