Wednesday, September 11, 2013
Do We Learn to Love Bad Art?
Does great art last because it is great or is it great because it lasts?
Do works find a place in the canon by familiarity, like a ubiquitous
tune you can’t shake, or do they play on through sheer merit? A recent
study in the British Journal of Aesthetics by Meskin et al titled “Mere Exposure to Bad Art”
examines the effect of “mere exposure” on how people perceive art.
After showing students slides of “good” art (landscapes by 19th century British painter John Everett Millais) and “bad” art (works by the trademarked “Painter of Light” himself, Thomas Kinkade)
at differing frequencies, the researchers suggest that looking at bad
art more often makes us hate it even more (or so they hope). But is it
still possible for us to learn to love bad art? Please come over to Picture This at Big Think to read more of "Do We Learn to Love Bad Art?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment